Talk:Nea Poteidaia

As Requested

Neptunekh, as requested, we have done two of the three request. Hope you like it, if you want the article to be included in other categories, just advise us and we shall amend it accordingly. As for the editing of the article, we will get around to it in due course.

Philhellenism 08:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Nea Potidaia

These two articles seem to refer to the same location. They should be merged. Neelix (talk) 17:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge history part of this article with Potidaia

The history part of this article is overapping with the Potidaia article. Each one has many useful details which are lacking in the other. This is a pity, because somebody reading one of thme mught miss the information in the other. Either you consider the 20th Century Nea Potidea as being the same as the ancient Potidaia, and than everything should be in this article and there should be no sepeatate Potidaia article. In my view, this is a bit artificial but you could make a cse for it. Or you should consider Nea Potidea as a 20th century place built on an ancient site with no direct continuity - and then the article should not contain information beofre 1922, just a reference to the other aricle.

You should sign with tilde's. Anyway I'm going to make a quick merger with detail already there, but I will do no research (for now) and add nothing else. Naturally this will not be satisfactory but it will be a start.Botteville (talk) 08:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huns in 540 AD?

Should it be 440?--Dipa1965 (talk) 22:20, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]